There was a recent rumor about the Hodge Conjecture. I'd keep an eye on that one. But like the other person who replied, I'm also rooting for Yang-Mills. That has massive potential for unlocking a series of physics results.

interesting, i haven't heard anything about that. i don't know much about the hodge conjecture, all i really know is that it's incredibly abstract and obtuse - not sure if that has any implication for solvability by an AI though. do you have any source for the hodge rumor? curious to learn more

And don't forget, this is the worst it'll ever be.

Disappointing to see Michael Levin's name on this.

Weights:

https://huggingface.co/Extropic-AI

Code:

https://github.com/extropic-ai/sparse-transformers

Release the Kraken!

This should probably be primary:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49541149

>Give GPT-3.5 a 1M context window and a modern harness, and you won't see any meaningful difference with Opus 5.

>models are currently regressing. Opus 5 is much much worse than Opus 4.6

I'm in sheer awe at these takes. Literally beyond parody.

Striking argument.

Announcement / benchmarks:

https://x.com/Alibaba_Qwen/status/2094968708288680276

Great article. I was waiting for someone to eventually do an assessment on this grifter.

"Vibecoded" science is well on its way to being better than your "real Science™". Withholding the future is not an option.

I'm sure there will be some golden nuggets in the petabytes of slop that are about to be unleashed.

The signal to noise ratio will be so bad that all of science will suffer.

Every doomer claim of this sort has not only failed to come true, but the exact opposite has happened. For instance, see the tsunami of new incredible results in mathematics.